Showing posts with label manmohan singh. Show all posts
Showing posts with label manmohan singh. Show all posts

Sunday, February 24, 2013

Indian Economic Revival - Another Chance Squandered?

Under the political stewardship of the father of India's economic reforms, it is surprising that this government has violated some of the very basic good economic governance principals.  Or is it that this government became so delusional about the amount of wealth or the consistency of maintaining the growth of the heady days of 2006 and 2007 that it took gamble with its finance, which are now coming back to haunt it. Or is it that the people who pushed for some of these economic programs (Sonia Gandhi and Coterie) came from non economic backgrounds and with no leadership vision to see what is right for the nation over next many decades vs. the here and now. Have we again squandered our chance of providing decent living to our people that is not based on grants, but rather on providing people the opportunities to earn it themselves?

Government came up with a bill NREGA - National Rural Employment Guarantee Act - 2005, that guarantees 100 days employment to any adult in the Rural area. However, it is missing one crucial component, guarantee of commensurate output from the States/ Municipalities that execute this program. For all practical purposes, central government just provides wages to people, if they show up for work, even if there is no work.

On one side, people get paid for doing mostly nothing productive, on the other side, the productive part of economy is being starved of labour. People from the farmlands of Punjab and Haryana can testify this. No labourers for the sowing and harvesting seasons.Whosoever is available asks for wages that are many times over what was normal. Labour intensive construction industry is hit equally bad.

It is a double whammy, while the govt is spending tax payer's money on unproductive work, that too something that is locked down for years to come, it is creating supply side constraint for productive part of economy that depends on flow of labour. In a labour surplus country the government policies are creating labour shortage. We are squandering our only competitive advantage in the world, large pool of cheap labour. It is not surprising that we see high inflation in these areas.


Another bad economic decision - Petro products price regulation - When UPA came to power in 2004, under Manmohan Singh, it brought the petro product priving under government control. Contrary to what one would have expected from an economist of Manmohan Singh's stature, he turned the economic logic on its head and killed the open market that was created by the previous NDA regime for the petro products. Many private companies lost their investment and many foreign companies that wanted to enter India, in petro retailing, just pulled their investments out. Now, for last few years, the government is trying to undo its doings by deregulating the petro prices. Once step forward, one step back and a decade lost.

There are so many such instances of economic blindness that it is not funny. 

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

Mamta Vs Manmohan - economically speaking


When it comes to politics, Mamta wins hands down. 

I watched her press conference announcing withdrawal of support to UPA. Trigger for the decision, as she mentioned, were two issues - diesel price hike and FDI in multibrand retail. Both the issues economic in nature. 

Question -  does she know more about economics than Manmohan Singh? Should Mamta decide country's economic policies?

A quick comparison, (from wikipedia)-


Mamta's educational qualification - 

Banerjee graduated with an honours degree in History from the Jogamaya Devi College, an undergraduate women's college in southern Kolkata. Later she earned a master's degree in Islamic History from the University of Calcutta. This was followed by a degree in education from the Shri Shikshayatan College. She also earned a law degree from the Jogesh Chandra Chaudhuri Law College, Kolkata.


Manmohan's educational qualification -

He attended Panjab University, Chandigarh, then in Hoshiarpur, Punjab, studying Economics and got his bachelor's and master's degrees in 1952 and 1954, respectively, standing first throughout his academic career. He went on to read for the Economics Tripos at Cambridge as a member of St John's College. He won the Wright's Prize for distinguished performance in 1955 and 1957. He was also one of the few recipients of the Wrenbury scholarship. In 1962, Singh completed his studies from the University of Oxford where he was a member of Nuffield College. His doctoral thesis "India’s export performance, 1951–1960, export prospects and policy implications" was later the base for his book "India’s Export Trends and Prospects for Self-Sustained Growth"


Mamta's early career - 

Banerjee became involved with politics while still in school, joining the Congress (I) Party in West Bengal and serving in a variety of positions within the party and in other local political organizations. As a young woman in the 1970s, she quickly rose in the ranks to become the general secretary of the state Mahila Congress (1976–80).She was a college student in the mid-1970s.

Manmohan's early career - 

After completing his PhD, Singh worked for the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) from 1966–1969. During the 1970s, he taught at the University of Delhi and worked for the Ministry of Foreign Trade with the former Cabinet Minister for Foreign Trade, Lalit Narayan Mishra. As the Minister of Foreign Trade, Lalit Narayan Mishra was one of the first to recognize Singh's talent as an economist and appointed him his advisor at the Ministry of Foreign Trade. Singh and Mishra first met, coincidentally, on a flight from India to Chile. Mishra was on his way to Santiago, Chile to attend an UNCTAD meeting.

In 1982, he was appointed the Governor of the Reserve Bank of India and held the post until 1985. He went on to become the deputy chairman of thePlanning Commission of India from 1985 to 1987. Following his tenure at the Planning Commission, he was Secretary General of the South Commission, an independent economic policy think tank headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland from 1987 to 1990.

Mamta's track record  -

In 2009, Mamata Banerjee became the railway minister for the second time. Her focus was again on West Bengal. She neglected her duties as a railway minister to concentrate on electioneering in West Bengal.
She led Indian Railways to introduce a number of non-stop Duronto Express trains connecting large cities besides a number of other passenger trains, including women-only trains. The Anantnag-Qadigund railway line of the Kashmir railway that has been in the making since 1994 was inaugurated during her tenure. She also declared the 25-km long line-1 of Kolkata Metro as an independent Zone of the Indian Railways for which she was criticized.
Reuters reported that "Her two-year record as railway minister has been heavily criticized for running the network into more debt to pay for populist measures such as more passenger trains."The Indian Railways became loss-making in her two-year tenure. Even before stepping down as railway minister to become the Chief Minister of West Bengal, she declared that she would be able to handle both the portfolios together. Her nominee Dinesh Trivedi from her party succeeded her as railway minister.
On 14 March 2012, Dinesh Trivedi announced the annual rail budget 2012 that included an all over hike in passenger fares, ranging from 2 paise to 30 paise per kilometre for reasons of safety, along with network expansion and associated modernisations. The rail fare had not been hiked for nearly a decade  putting Indian Railways in ICU as far as its financial viability was concerned. The proposed fare hike would have added 4200 crores to railways income, which while paltry compared to its expenses, would still have saved railways from becoming bankrupt. The budget received enthusiastic support from a wide cross section of society including the general public, industry groups and all five Rail Unions. However, the fare hike proposal in the budget was fiercely opposed by Mamata Banerjee. Although Trivedi initially tried to defend the budget by pointing out that it was necessary for making Indian Railways stronger, Mamata Banerjee forced him to resign as Railway Minister on 18 March 2012

Manmohan's track record -

Following the advice of International Monetary Fund in 1991, Singh as Finance Minister, freed India from the Licence Raj, source of slow economic growth and corruption in the Indian economy for decades. He liberalized the Indian economy, allowing it to speed up development dramatically. During his term as Prime Minister, Singh continued to encourage growth in the Indian market, enjoying widespread success in these matters. Singh, along with the former Finance Minister, P. Chidambaram, have presided over a period where the Indian economy has grown with an 8–9% economic growth rate. In 2007, India achieved its highest GDP growth rate of 9% and became the second fastest growing major economy in the world.

Singh is now a strong supporter of globalization, seeing India's immense labor capacity as a path to delivering Indian goods in a worldwide market and eventually relieving large-scale poverty.
Singh's government has continued the Golden Quadrilateral and the highway modernisation program that was initiated by Vajpayee's government. Singh has also been working on reforming the banking and financial sectors, as well as public sector companies. The Finance ministry has been working towards relieving farmers of their debt and has been working towards pro-industry policies. In 2005, Singh's government introduced the value added tax, replacing sales tax. In 2007 and early 2008, the global problem of inflation impacted India.

Now, I let the readers draw their own conclusion. A litmus test for each one of us though, if you were to send your kids for economics education, who would you send them to - Professor Mamta or Master Manmohan? 





Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Before Status Quo takes over


Manmohan Singh,
Finance Minister,
Government of India

Subject: 6 things to do before status quo takes over

Sir,

Congratulations on taking over the additional charge of Finance Ministry! (Thank God, Pranab Mukerjee is out and so, hopefully, the 1980's economic thinking).

People expect change. They have high hopes from you. Don't let this opportunity slip by. If you wait, status quo will take over. Here are some of the items that you may want to start with.

Get rid of the changes in tax laws with retrospective effect. Make a statement, or come up with a policy stating that changes with effect from back date won't happen going forward.  

Get rid of GAAR, it is arbitrary, ambiguous and open to interpretation. If you must tax transactions that happen abroad but involve assets in India, then make it mandatory for the asset to change hands in India as well, to a newly registered entity. Let that asset gets valued independently and then tax it as per exiting norms. What I am proposing may not be best possible solution, as I am not an expert, however the idea is to take out ambiguity, arbitrariness from proposed GAAR.

Untangle the wires in telecom sector. One of the showcase sectors of our economy, a sector that is an enabler for larger economy, is now bogged down in procedural and legal hassles. The guilty must be punished, but please don't look at maximizing the money thru' auction  and cripple the growth of this industry. Don't kill golden egg laying goose.

Announce a plan to completely get rid of diesel subsidy. Put a timetable in place, clearly showing, when the entire energy sector is going to get decontrolled and deregularized. The money thus saved, should help reduce fiscal deficit and some should get pumped into research for renewable energy.

Implement GST, all the work has already been done. Give it a final push and get it implemented. Roll out multibrand FDI initiative, at least let those states that want to implement it get started. But ensure that those states don't go back and force the businesses to shut down, when the government changes. That will be a kiss of death for the Indian economy.

Put better administrators in charge of government departments. Put some kind of status reporting mechanism in place for all government employees. Hold them accountable. Inefficiency is rampant. Meetings get pushed. Leaves are taken in good measure. Holidays are plenty. Now and then there is a strike.

You know more than anyone else, it is a lot about sentiments and feel good factor. Restore it.


Your Truly,